What does frustration of contract mean

Certain risks are deemed inherent to contracting. For example, delay in a construction contract due to a shortage of skilled labour was found not to have frustrated the contract because the delay did not result in a new state of affairs that the parties could not have reasonably foreseen see Davis Contractors Limited v Fareham Urban District Council [] AC Frustration will also not be found where the event in question has been foreseen by the parties or could reasonably have thought to have been foreseen.

The reasoning of the courts in the case above was that the risk of labour shortages was apportioned to the builder because it was a possibility before the parties' eyes. Where there is an express provision in the contract that deals with the consequences of a particular event, the parties cannot then claim that that same event has frustrated their venture. If parties to a contract can seriously foresee the occurrence of an event or events but make no provision for it in the contract, and then seek to rely upon the event as frustrating the contract, it may be inferred that the parties accepted the risk of the occurrence of the event and the contract not being found to have been frustrated.

Frustration will also not be found where one of the parties is at fault. For example, charterers who had failed to obtain a licence for a fishing trawler were not entitled to avoid their contract because the frustration was self-induced.

Often the conclusion that a particular contract has or has not been frustrated may be almost completely determined by what a judge or arbitrator sees as the commercial significance of the event relied upon as frustrating the contract.

Notwithstanding that frustration of contract is difficult to establish, drafting contracts broadly enough to apply to new situations or circumstances can assist parties seeking to avoid a contract being found to be frustrated. For example, force majeure clauses are used in contracts to avoid frustration. These are clauses that suspend performance in the occurrence of supervening events not the fault of either party but maintain the existence of the contract.

To avoid a contract being found to have been frustrated, parties should apportion risks, as far as possible. In Codelfa the construction company contracted with the Rail Authority to carry out extensions to Sydney's rail network by building track and stations in the eastern suburbs.

Time was of the essence as construction had to be completed by a particular date. To do so, work was conducted around the clock for each day of the week. The Authority and various legal advisers had represented to Codelfa, the construction company, that it was immune from any grant of injunctions that would limit its ability to do such work.

Injunctions, however, were granted to the local council and residents when the work caused noise and vibration, showing the advice to be erroneous. Should the customer be forced by a court to bear that risk? Limitations to Discharge by Frustration The frustrating event can't : cracked-road be reasonably foreseeable by the parties. It must be coupled with a change in the significance of the contract obligation, that: the obligation undertaken would, if performed, be a different thing from that contracted for Common Assumptions be based on a common assumption that an event or state of affairs will be maintained.

Example: Destruction of subject matter of the contract Suppose you own a plantation of pine trees. You enter into a contract for the sale of the pine trees. Assume lightning strikes are not common in the part of the world that the plantation is located. Lightning strikes one of the trees and causes to the trees to burn an Act of God. The contract would likely be frustrated.

Example: Fixed Price Contract; Materials and Labour shortage A contract required construction of 80 houses over 9 months. Work begins. The contractor wanted to be paid more for the work. The customer refused to raise the price. The contract was not frustrated. The builder was in breach of contract. Example: More Onerous Performance The sellers agreed to sell to buyers Sudanese ground nuts for shipment. The sellers refused to ship the goods. The contract in that case was frustrated. What are some alternatives to Frustration?

Here are a few. Implied conditions A common implied term is one whereby a continuing state of affairs would continue. Conditional Contracts; Contracts subject to a Condition The contract was conditional upon an event would or would not take place.

Mutual Mistake Obtaining legal relief for mutual mistake is limited to mistakes of fact, not law. Quantum Meruit Quantum meruit claims rely on an implied promise to pay a reasonable sum for the work done and a failure to pay such sum.

What are the remedies in contract law for frustration? When a contract is frustrated: it happens automatically, by operation of law it is "discharged", and terminates.

But that's a "legal fiction". Disputes arise. Parties disagree. One says it was a frustrating event. That may lead to a lawsuit. Companies sue one another to resolve the dispute. You could think of this as an inbuilt preservation of rights clause.

For instance: a party could have owed money on the contract and the amount remained to be paid, or a party might have been in breach of contract. There may be secondary obligations which continue after the frustration such as preservation of confidential information. When the Contract is not Frustrated It is almost certain that one of the parties will be in repudiatory breach of contract, because the contract was not performed.

Coronavirus Developments and Frustration Contextual Examples The fact that there is a pandemic ie a global epidemic on its own is not likely to frustrate a contract. The performance requirements may be localised to a particular geographic location and not cause supply chain problems to the service provider or supplier.

Another type of contract might depend entirely on supply of components of products from China. China itself suffered a shutdown of industry, with well-reported delays to manufacturing activity and supply delays: as you would expect when 40 million people are required to stay at home.

On the other hand, even with a "stay at home" order by local government doesn't necessarily answer the problem. IT Consultancy services which might be delivered remotely without personal attendance on site by a contractor - even if painfully difficult and more expensive to deliver - can still be performed and delivered.

It's less likely that the contract has been frustrated. Contrast this situation in with a hypothetical pandemic in the early s. If a pandemic similar to the Coronavirus crisis was to have happened in the early s, before remote working became possible and not even prevalent , then the answer would probably be different. It's not the sort of area of law that applies in the abstract.

Guideline Test for Frustration: Complete the following sentence, replacing the prompts with the circumstances of the supervening event and the subject matter of the contract. For example: The parties had not foreseen, nor should be expected to have foreseen that [the car having been destroyed by a freak accident] might be taken to interfere with the [sale of the car], and would make it impossible to perform the contract on terms which bore any real commercial resemblance to those agreed between the parties.

All of that has to be read against the backdrop of the terms of the contract. Consequences of Frustration: Remedies Termination by Frustration Not only does the law of frustration end the contract where a supervening event takes place. Pre-paid products and services When customers have prepaid for products or services, English law in some circumstances requires the contractor or consultant service provider, or supplier of a product to refund prepayments of money for the performance the contract.

Conclusion extreme-heat Parties as a matter of course whether they know it or not allocate risk of future events in their contracts.

The justice of the case requires that the contract no longer applies. When a contract is frustrated, all future obligations are automatically discharged but obligations due to be performed before frustration remain. This means expenses incurred or costs paid to the point of frustration cannot be recovered, and payments due at that point will likely remain payable. This may result in a party having paid for goods or services it will not receive, or alternatively, having received goods or services for which it does not have to pay.

Some states, but not Queensland, have legislation to ameliorate such consequences. A force majeure clause in a contract is designed to overcome the limited application of the frustration doctrine by providing what is to happen if a specified event hampers performance of the contract.

If a force majeure clause is activated, the consequences could include termination of the contract, payment of compensation to an affected party, or suspension of obligations for the parties during the force majeure event.

COVID has had an unprecedented impact on businesses. However, the pandemic will not automatically frustrate the performance of all contracts; an assessment must be made of how COVID has impacted the performance of a particular contract. If the virus makes performing the contract impossible or illegal, rather than more difficult or delayed, then it may be a frustrating event. Businesses should not rely on the existence of a force majeure clause, either, to ameliorate the effects of the pandemic on a contract.

If the clause were activated, the parties would then need to determine when the force majeure event began i. There are many ways a contract can end. When performance under a contract is affected by an event beyond the control of the parties to the contract, it is important that the parties know what their liabilities are.

Frustration of contract is a complex area of law that needs careful consideration so that parties do not inadvertently breach their obligations. If you are a party to a contract that you believe might have been frustrated, you should seek immediate legal advice. Contact Gibbs Wright Litigation Lawyers today for a free and confidential initial consultation.

Share on facebook Facebook Share on twitter Twitter Share on linkedin LinkedIn The content of this publication is intended as general commentary only and may not be suitable or applicable to your personal circumstances. It is not intended to replace independent legal advice. You can contact us at our Brisbane Office for a free consultation on a range of litigation matters on 07 Need a Litigation Lawyer? If you have a dispute in Queensland, we can help resolve it. See our Services. About Gibbs Wright Gibbs Wright is a Queensland litigation law firm based in Brisbane that exclusively practices in civil and commercial litigation, negotiation and dispute resolution throughout Queensland, Australia.

In circumstances where one party to the contract has already obtained a valuable non-monetary benefit before the contract is discharged, that party may be ordered by the court to pay to the other party a sum that the court considers just. You can find the contingency plans that we have put in place, along with further advice, here.

If you have any queries surrounding this article please do not hesitate to get in contact with our team on or email enquiries stephens-scown. By pressing send and providing your details you are agreeing to our Privacy Notice. March 19, Last updated: September 10, Covid is going to be used as a reason to terminate all sorts of contracts and agreements. Principally this will be by activating Force Majeure clauses and or the doctrine of Frustration.